Re: [NetEpic ML] FYI on void

From: Tom Webb <Webbsoft_at_...>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 14:42:37 +0100

I spoke to the VOID people the other day about it, they were very keen on
it.

The only potential problem is with Games Workshop interference, they don't
mind EPIC as they consider it a lost cause, but as for 40k, they are very
vicous when it comes any breach of copyright.

Tom.
----- Original Message -----
From: "dardman" <dardman_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] FYI on void


> What's the difference? The game only cost 9.99. It is priced reasonably
and
> plays smoothly. I play Void and I play 40k because there are few Void
> players in my area. I like Void. It is a much better game than 40k. The
only
> difference in the rules is that they are short and concise so there is
very
> little argueing over rules and also the fluff by GW is better and
lengthier
> (but I don't buy games for fluff I read books). I think a Void army list
for
> Net Epic would be cool. These armies would be more infantry based than GW
> and the emphasis on CC would be greater. Just a thought.
> Darius
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> NetZero Platinum
> Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
> http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Sat Aug 11 2001 - 13:42:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:24 UTC