RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Dark eldar revision part 1 (long)

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:43:09 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_coqui.net]
> Sent: 16. August 2001 15:51
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Dark eldar revision part 1 (long)
>
>
> Hi!
>
> While I dont mind special rules and such, I am very loathe to give an
> infantry stand this ability of needing -1 weapons. While many
> units have
> kick ass abilities they still may be slain with regular fire with no
> modifiers. Of course you can always test it, but remember that such a
> unit is immune to fire UNLESS there is a unit capable of -1
> fire close
> by. Given the right circumstances this could be extremely unbalancing.
>

Yep. Especially since the only units currently immune to 0 save mod weapons
are superheavy tanks and anything with a void shield. The comparsion is, of
course, not entirely fair but you get the idea.


> By the way people please trim the post this one is getting
> too long and
> consuming too much byte space.
>
> Peter
>
> Trygve Bjørnstad wrote:
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
Received on Fri Aug 17 2001 - 05:43:09 UTC