RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:14:06 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 01. November 2001 17:52
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> Fifth, If the primarchs were at about the same level as
> greater daemons I
> > can't see a problem. After all, a Chaos player can have
> multiple of those
> > while I can't see there ever being more than one primarch
> present at any
> > single battle.
>
> --------> Chaos is the hardest army to beat,

That's something which is IMO a matter of opinion.

> so I definately
> see a problem there! The deamon army is constructed around
> the greater deamons with mostly easy breakable supportcards.
> Thats at least some easy VPs.
>

And there would be just ONE primarch stand in a 10000point army or above. If
he costs about 400 points that leaves 9600+ points of other troops.


> I hate the thought of having to face a number of Great
> Companies led by an overcheesed Leman Russ! :-)
>
> Eivind

Why ON EARTH is the presupposition that it will be "overcheese"????????
Especially when those units would be OPTIONAL. Repeat: O-P-T-I-O-N-A-L. How
many people have EVER used those optional Leman Russ variants I made? Or
those optional new chapter rules for that matter? I sure haven't gotten any
playtest reports.

Besides, I'm really surprised if, even after the new armies are complete,
most people won't continue to play in the age of Imperium when they're not
around. Like Rune said, this is all about having more choices. It's easier
to leave out something which exists than trying to get in something which
doesn't.

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
Received on Fri Nov 02 2001 - 07:14:06 UTC