RE: [NetEpic ML] Netepic Background

From: Darryl Hilbig <darrylhilbig_at_...>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 17:30:55

Why can't the danger/expansion come from the top or the bottom, that way
both edges are available for flufferation.

Darryl H

>There is one problem with the western part of the galaxy. Namely, the bulk
>of the Imperium is situated there (Terra is in galactic west). While I
>don't say there's no room for anything else the western part of the galaxy
>is far more explored than the eastern part, since there is much less space
>the Astronomican does not cover.
>
>
>Jyrki Saari
>
>-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
>money.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
>Sent: 03. November 2001 4:05
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Netepic Background
>
>
>Hi!
>
>It would be good with someone with eh BFG books or another source that
>names the sectors of Imperial space to name them as in aid in fleshing out
>quadrants.
>
>Peter
>
>One thing put the sector on the western fringe, Almost all the GW fluff is
>set out east I think it would be nice to have something on the west
>
>-->There is some GW fluff for the Galactic West. Mostly it involves the
>massive IG campaign to the fringe of the Beacon, and somewhat beyond. The
>name of the Warmaster for the campaign escapes me (Solon? something like
>that), and my IG book is in a box somewhere...
>
>Josh R
>
>Minister for General Mayhem
>"Don't let the bastards grind you down." Gen. Joseph Stilwell
>Gott weiss ich will kein Engel sein -Rammstein


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Received on Mon Nov 05 2001 - 17:30:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:28 UTC