Hi!
Sounds good, beastmasters it is and no one else.
Who ever said GW was logical?
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:57 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] REPOST: my comments to the DE drafts
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 07. November 2001 23:10
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] REPOST: my comments to the DE drafts
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > So the question now is what Eldar unit would deserve this?
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
> Or rather, why use it at all. IMO it would be enough to give only the
> beastmaster a higher move, attribute it to some advanced equipment and
leave
> the rest a normal move. We shouldn't try to take the 40k3 too much into
> account or soon we will have tanks which can't move and shoot at the same
> turn. This is , BTW, my biggest bone of contention with GW systems: the
> races there have warp capable ships, plasma reactors and psychic
engineering
> and yet seem to be totally unable to produce stabilizers and
rangefinders...
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is
> money.
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 08 2001 - 17:31:55 UTC