RE: [NetEpic ML] REPOST: my comments to the DE drafts

From: Darryl Hilbig <darrylhilbig_at_...>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 07:42:17

My comments at bottom after Jyrki's

>From: jyrki.saari_at_...
>> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] REPOST: my comments to the DE drafts
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > So the question now is what Eldar unit would deserve this?
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
>Or rather, why use it at all. IMO it would be enough to give only the
>beastmaster a higher move, attribute it to some advanced equipment and
>leave
>the rest a normal move. We shouldn't try to take the 40k3 too much into
>account or soon we will have tanks which can't move and shoot at the same
>turn. This is , BTW, my biggest bone of contention with GW systems: the
>races there have warp capable ships, plasma reactors and psychic
>engineering
>and yet seem to be totally unable to produce stabilizers and
>rangefinders...
>
>Jyrki Saari

Consider the sixe of the table & the ranges that weapons normally fire at
within the game. Make the big guns too accurate and why bother playing at
all.

Darryl H

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Received on Sat Nov 10 2001 - 07:42:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:28 UTC