Hi!
<grumble> should read all posts before answering. Its not that terrible
after all.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 6:45 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] DE summary
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Karlsen, Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > Sent: 12. November 2001 13:40
> > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] DE summary
> >
> >
> > imho there should be no weapons which totally disregard the quality
> > of troops. The Shadow Spinner kills on a 4+. This applies no matter
> > what kind of save the troops have. This means that this weapon will
> > be more "cost effective" against more expensive troops. Any effect
> > which does not actually kill the troops, is ok, but as long as it
> > kills, it should take into account what kind of troops it kills.
> >
> > Rune
> >
>
> The shadow spinner is identical to the Eldar Doomweaver. The wording is
> exactly the same. Check the Eldar armylist.
>
> [snip]
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is
> money.
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 13 2001 - 22:16:12 UTC