Hi!
They are trying to take player input more seriously, but they seem to "selectively" pick what to ficus attention on. For the most part ATII was shunned by epic40k players, yet they persist in supporting it. Epic40k players have expressed that although some tweaking is desirable, the core rules are to their liking, but in this is are somewhat ignored too.
Hehe, if they want to put out a good game they should use Heresy <chuckle>!
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:04 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Epic 40,000 evolution
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 01. February 2002 14:02
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic 40,000 evolution
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Hmmm.. Jervis is sure saying that alot lately in firepower,
> > that the game is dying. I wonder what he bases that on. The
> > changes sure sound pretty SM/TL, interesting.
> >
> > The funny thing is they never seem to listen to their player
> > base. What I mean those that love and play epic 40k seem to
> > be pretty happy with the rules, yet they bring out the AT II
> > rules and these changes. They didn't listen to us prior to
> > releasing epic 40k and now they don't listen to those who DO
> > support the game by changing it. Go figure.
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
> However, there is ONE positive indicator: they're finally beta-releasing their rules for general playtesting.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 01 2002 - 12:25:43 UTC