RE: [NetEpic ML] Epic 40,000 evolution

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:34:26 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_caribe.net]
> Sent: 01. February 2002 14:26
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic 40,000 evolution
>
>
> Hi!
>
> They are trying to take player input more seriously, but they
> seem to "selectively" pick what to ficus attention on. For
> the most part ATII was shunned by epic40k players, yet they
> persist in supporting it. Epic40k players have expressed that
> although some tweaking is desirable, the core rules are to
> their liking, but in this is are somewhat ignored too.
>

Yeah, I've noticed the same trend... What they should do is to separate infantry and heavy weapons as well as do away with the mix'n match detachments by replacing them with something a bit more restrictive system.

> Hehe, if they want to put out a good game they should use
> Heresy <chuckle>!
>

In fact I thought about that too, but then the big H wouldn't be free so I didn't say anything.

> Peter
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Fri Feb 01 2002 - 12:34:26 UTC