Hi!
You realize Josh once you go down that path of change this or that it will beg the question again and again to do the rules from scratch. <grin> I will also be questioning all the rules to see what threshhold Jervis has.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <deaconblue3_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [Armageddon] Initial Response from Jervis
> I'll second Ken's nomination for NetEpic letter coordinator. As he is
> the best suited for the job, based on his "relationship" with Jervis. To
> add to the discussion a bit more, the one thing that I want to see
> changed is the "morale system" in E40K. It doesn't work IMO. Find an
> alternate method of handling morale and victory conditions. This
> mechanic has the ability to produce some very lame duck results, that do
> not reflect the *ahem* "realities" of the battle, nor do they always
> reward the better tactician, or who achieves their objectives. It's the
> biggest gripe I have about E40K.
>
> Josh R
>
> "No matter where you go, there you are." B.Bonzai
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 13 2002 - 19:57:39 UTC