Re: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:52:22 -0400

Hi!

That works!

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_nokia.com>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited


> We could say that elite units add one to the suppression roll.
>
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> Sent: 04. March 2002 16:49
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I guess that would be a good approach. I'd also add that elite units should ignore one suppression counter.
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: trygve_at_...
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:32 AM
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
>
> I agree. This looks good... A suppression rule that doesn't favour any army and it doesn't require too much bookkeeping.
>
> One question though. What about robotic minds? Do they act the same way as juggers/rampage?
>
> Trygve
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=214508.1858224.3361270.1501205/D=egroupweb/S=1705059081:HM/A=950748/R=0/*http://content.search.shopping.yahoo.com/search/tmpl?tmpl=psshowcase2001.html&query=tag:PSshowcase2001+%23cversion%3A%7Bimage_PSshowcase2001+url_PSshowcase2001+desc_PSshowcase2001+title_PSshowcase2001+morehtml_PSshowcase2001%7D&q=PSshowcase2001>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=214508.1858224.3361270.1501205/D=egroupmail/S=1705059081:HM/A=950748/rand=833033100>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 04 2002 - 14:52:22 UTC