Re: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:56:23 -0400

Hi!

Why so? The ones Jyrki did don't favor any army over the other.

Peter
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: nils.saugen_at_...
  To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:50 AM
  Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited


  Hi,

  One question that has plagued me for this entire discussion....

  Wouldn't any of these suppression rules be murder for any Eldar Army????

  Nils
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
    Sent: 4. mars 2002 15:49
    To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited


    Hi!

    I guess that would be a good approach. I'd also add that elite units should ignore one suppression counter.

    Peter
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: trygve_at_...
      To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:32 AM
      Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited


      I agree. This looks good... A suppression rule that doesn't favour any army and it doesn't require too much bookkeeping.

      One question though. What about robotic minds? Do they act the same way as juggers/rampage?

      Trygve


    To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


  To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Received on Mon Mar 04 2002 - 14:56:23 UTC