Exactly! And besides the Eldar is very reliant on their mobility! Most
opponents would quite easily be able to pin down any eldar army.... I don't
know about you, but I think Eldar is already one of the most difficult
armies to play well....
Well, just my to cents anyway.....
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: 4. mars 2002 16:02
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
I think he means the small detachments. However, the Guardian detachments
aren't any smaller than marine detachments, and if these rules discourage
all-aspect armies that is, IMO, a good thing. Also, it is worth noting that
passengers aren't suppressed even if their transports are.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 04. March 2002 16:56
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
Hi!
Why so? The ones Jyrki did don't favor any army over the other.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: nils.saugen_at_...
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
Hi,
One question that has plagued me for this entire discussion....
Wouldn't any of these suppression rules be murder for any Eldar Army????
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 4. mars 2002 15:49
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
Hi!
I guess that would be a good approach. I'd also add that elite units should
ignore one suppression counter.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: trygve_at_...
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suppression revisited
I agree. This looks good... A suppression rule that doesn't favour any army
and it doesn't require too much bookkeeping.
One question though. What about robotic minds? Do they act the same way as
juggers/rampage?
Trygve
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
<
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=214508.1858224.3361270.1501205/D=egroupweb/S=17050590
81:HM/A=950747/R=0/*
http://content.search.shopping.yahoo.com/search/tmpl?tmp
l=psshowcase2001.html&query=tag:PSshowcase2001+%23cversion%3A%7Bimage_PSshow
case2001+url_PSshowcase2001+desc_PSshowcase2001+title_PSshowcase2001+morehtm
l_PSshowcase2001%7D&q=PSshowcase2001>
<
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=214508.1858224.3361270.1501205/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705059081:HM/A=950747/rand=805983539>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Mar 05 2002 - 09:26:55 UTC