Hi!
Remeber infantry needs to be directly attacked to engaged flyers and then only with a -2 penalty. this includes HQ's that are infantry units as well as psykers that are infantry units. This gives a slight edge to Orks who have wierdboys in vehicles and thus could function as a poor mans AA guns. Normally most psykers would do poorly against flyers.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "antichrist666it" <seimejote_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Another 2 questions for you, Peter... :P
> --- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > > 1 - In Incoming 3, I've read an article (Titan Revenge!) with a
> new
> > > system to handle titan damage... it's mentioned that the titans
> are
> > > more pricy, but... where are the new prices?
> >
> > Yikes! Your asking a question on something done a couple of years
> ago. To be frank I don't have an answer. I'd just use the points
> values as they exist currently. Once you try it and test it, your a
> far better judge than I as to newer points cost.
> >
> > > 2 - Psykers can affect Flyers in any way?
> >
> > Only an attack that has a direct immediate effect, like a bolt of
> energy (like a wierdboy) affects fliers. Effects that have a template
> effect or require that the victims mind be contacted (like mind
> blast) DO NOT WORK. Basically if the attack works like a "shot" it
> works against a flier. If it doens't work like a standard "shot" it
> doesn't work. This is to avoid cheesy plays like casting
> vortex/tempest/mind blast and other such attacks on fliers. Fliers
> would easily by pass such attacks due to their sheer speeds and too
> little time in one place.
> >
> > Peter
>
> So the psyker doesn't have to be an AA unit? And this is valid only
> for psyker or extends to all HQ units too (i think not)?
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 08 2002 - 14:38:51 UTC