Hi!
Thats not a bad caviat. IF You use a bike company you are not allowed any "bike" support cards, since the resources for them have been used in the company. SM after all dont have that many resources to have bike only armies.
Ravenwing, I still think is distinct since it has landspeeders in it, so I dont worry about losing that "difference". Besides they'd get bike cmpany too, perhaps as mentioned more than one, that gives them the edge.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "P.J.T" <paul.j.t_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Problem with Marines
> <snip>
>
> > Company Card:
> > Name: Space Marine Bike Company
> > Contents: 1 HQ of 1 bike stand, 2 bike detachments of 5 bike stands and 1
> attack bike detachment of 5 attack bikes.
> > Break Point: 8
> > Morale: 2
> > Victory Points: 3
> > Cost:325
> > Special Rules: Since the bike company represents the bulk of a Chapter's
> bike forces no bike support cards may be fielded together with the bike
> company.
> >
>
> Stormwind proposal sounds cool.
> I'd be slightly hesitant about the bike company however on the Ravenwing
> basis - you'd be eliminating one of the differences between the DA chapter
> and the others. Unless you said that the third company of a DA force could
> be the Ravenwing and the 6th could be a bike force maybe. (?)
>
> Also, If you do take on the bike company, I think you should be able to take
> more bike units, but only if they are suport units TO the bike company. If
> you have a Bike company card, no other company can be supported by bikes. My
> wording there is terrible but do you get what I mean?
>
> > Jyrki Saari
> >
> > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
> is money.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul "TuffSkull" T.
> http://epic40k.com - If its Epic, Its there! (Now an Official Warpgate
> Network site!)
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 13 2002 - 12:11:05 UTC