Hi!
Daniel is still our editor, I keep in touch with him from time to time, but life has kept him busy. But there are other busy little beavers I haven't mentioned yet. You'd be surprised with all the stufff they have done. I'm still going over a lot of it.
You're right about the layouts. I'd keep titans and praetorians in their own books. Its a pain to look up the way they are now.
One thing I'm doing is to discuss ALL the rules, line by line if need be to get the proper wording. Same with unit descriptions.
Lots to do.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> Yes, and I feel we need to go back one step with the layout! We should
> include preatorians in their given army list again! Some rules should be
> rewritten for clearer understanding, like Grey Knights and Harleqins effect
> on Deaomns in CC! There's a lot of knowledge lost from the scrolls over the
> years!!! Some interpetations are so offical that they should be included!!!!
>
> However, this is an enourmous undertaking so we need quite a lot of
> participants!
> When we did the last revision, I seem to remember that Daniel Wolf was very
> active, hovexer I haven't seen him on the list for quite some time now.....
>
> Nils
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> Sent: 21. mars 2002 17:33
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
>
>
> Hi!
>
> It goes beyond that though. Version 5.0 also needs to be divided into basic
> and advance and we ALSO need to re-review certain rules and concepts that
> may not be so good (I got a few on record).
>
> The errata business is just a part of the whole thing. Its probably best
> errata be the last thing to do since doing it first, changing things will
> generate more.
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:24 PM
> Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
>
>
> > Hmmm,
> >
> > Perhaps we should make a 5.0 taskforce? To read through and make
> > corrections, and then post the rules in the vault, with the changes
> > highlighted so that the rest of the group could comment?
> >
> > Nils
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_caribe.net]
> > Sent: 21. mars 2002 17:21
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > <sigh> 5.0 will be something of a milestone, it has so much to do, so much
> > to correct and change it gets staggering. Prepare for a long ride.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
> > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:44 AM
> > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> >
> >
> > > Well, thats another one for the revision.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Eivind
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > Sent: 21. mars 2002 16:21
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > <grin> No, GW didn't clear it up, but then thats no surprise. Grey
> > knights
> > > are expensive, 400 for 4 stands. As far as I can remember I've always
> let
> > > them have any orders. It does make them useful, but no overly so.
> > Regarding
> > > not using first fire, I don't agree. I have read plenty of fluff where
> > they
> > > materialize and shoot to pieces whatever is there...sounds like first
> fire
> > > to me. Any limitation of what orders they take makes them worthless,
> they
> > > are barely useful as is, since they only are fielded against chaos. From
> a
> > > game balance point of view I'd leave them with the orders options, after
> > all
> > > don't even have psychic abilities, just a psychic save. Not much of a
> grey
> > > knight.....
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
> > > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:06 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hmm..
> > > >
> > > > I had to double-check myself, and it really does not say! An other
> > really
> > > > idotic thing is that it says in the text thattr Gray Knights only can
> be
> > > > fielded against Chaos, but on the illustrative picture, they are
> > battling
> > > a
> > > > genestealercult magus! Talk about consistency!!!
> > > >
> > > > I know my group has used them the way that they cant move or fire the
> > turn
> > > > they are teleported, but that makes them really har to use. I have yet
> > to
> > > > see them doany actual damage.
> > > >
> > > > I guess that allowing them to fire in advance fire segment would make
> > them
> > > > more usefull. Their movement should anyway be used up by teleporting
> in.
> > > >
> > > > A real tricky one. Guess we have to wait for the primarch to arise
> from
> > > his
> > > > sleep...
> > > >
> > > > Eivind
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: P.J.T [mailto:paul.j.t_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 21. mars 2002 14:55
> > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > Just checked SMII Armies of the Imperium, Its not mentioned which
> orders
> > > > they can be given - just the mechanics of actually teleporting (aim,
> > > > scatter).
> > > >
> > > > Makes sense that they shouldn't be able to first fire though.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Paul "TuffSkull" T.
> > > > http://epic40k.com - If its Epic, Its there! (Now an Official
> Warpgate
> > > > Network site!)
> > > > http://welcome.to/weird_world - Weird World Wargaming.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> > > > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:30 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: ext nils.saugen_at_sebkort.no [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > > > > > Sent: 21. March 2002 15:12
> > > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You should check the old GW rules! I think they enter on
> > > > > > advance orders, but
> > > > > > I'm not certain! However, I think it is stated clearly in the
> > > > > > old GW rules.
> > > > > > I could check that this afternoon if you don't have those
> > > > > > anymore! Or you
> > > > > > could have a look in the old Battles book (The big yellow
> > > > > > one), in the chaos
> > > > > > vs bloodangels game, they use Gray knights.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nils
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In the battlereport you mentioned they charged into CC with Magnus
> the
> > > Red
> > > > so judging from that they are on charge orders. However, IIRC it's not
> > > > specifically mentioned in the rules (surprise!).
> > > > >
> > > > > Jyrki Saari
> > > > >
> > > > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and
> > time
> > > > is money.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 21 2002 - 16:53:27 UTC