WOW!!
Are you using a whole company of teleporting termies???
My original rules was for a detachment only and brought about some noise in
my gaming group. (We are known to be a bit noisy though :-))
I think my group will stick to the rules of one detachment as a special
card, but with this clarification, they are now much more usable, and
actually worth their cost.
Eivind
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 24. mars 2002 13:56
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
Hi!
You are correct.
There was some trepidation with teleporting termies, but after having tested
them personally on a number of ocassions I don't see a disbalance with them.
Remember you give up your land raiders to teleport them and 1000 points is a
LOT. I think too that this makes them really worth it. I always thought
their lack of teleporting was strange, especially when all the fluff places
this ability in high regard.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "antichrist666it" <seimejote_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 6:12 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> So, to close the question... is this sequence correct (I'm speaking
> of simple teleported terminators)?
>
> 1 - Teleport and scatter
> 2 - Assign any order
> 3 - Activate unit as per orders assigned
>
> If it's true, finally Tele-Termies will be worth their points...
> (300/350 for 4 stands O_o) And even their Special card collocation is
> now understandable...
>
> --- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > After they land and have scattered.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...>
> > To: <netepic_at_y...>
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:06 AM
> > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> >
> >
> > > Another question though,when are the orders placed? Are they
> placed before or after the teleport and scatterprocess or are they
> placed when you know where the knights have landed?
> > >
> > > Eivind
> > > >
> > > > Fra: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...>
> > > > Dato: 2002/03/21 Thu PM 04:44:24 CET
> > > > Til: <netepic_at_y...>
> > > > Emne: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > >
> > > > Well, thats another one for the revision.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Eivind
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_c...]
> > > > Sent: 21. mars 2002 16:21
> > > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > > Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > <grin> No, GW didn't clear it up, but then thats no surprise.
> Grey knights
> > > > are expensive, 400 for 4 stands. As far as I can remember I've
> always let
> > > > them have any orders. It does make them useful, but no overly
> so. Regarding
> > > > not using first fire, I don't agree. I have read plenty of
> fluff where they
> > > > materialize and shoot to pieces whatever is there...sounds like
> first fire
> > > > to me. Any limitation of what orders they take makes them
> worthless, they
> > > > are barely useful as is, since they only are fielded against
> chaos. From a
> > > > game balance point of view I'd leave them with the orders
> options, after all
> > > > don't even have psychic abilities, just a psychic save. Not
> much of a grey
> > > > knight.....
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...>
> > > > To: <netepic_at_y...>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:06 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hmm..
> > > > >
> > > > > I had to double-check myself, and it really does not say! An
> other really
> > > > > idotic thing is that it says in the text thattr Gray Knights
> only can be
> > > > > fielded against Chaos, but on the illustrative picture, they
> are battling
> > > > a
> > > > > genestealercult magus! Talk about consistency!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > I know my group has used them the way that they cant move or
> fire the turn
> > > > > they are teleported, but that makes them really har to use. I
> have yet to
> > > > > see them doany actual damage.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess that allowing them to fire in advance fire segment
> would make them
> > > > > more usefull. Their movement should anyway be used up by
> teleporting in.
> > > > >
> > > > > A real tricky one. Guess we have to wait for the primarch to
> arise from
> > > > his
> > > > > sleep...
> > > > >
> > > > > Eivind
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: P.J.T [mailto:paul.j.t_at_b...]
> > > > > Sent: 21. mars 2002 14:55
> > > > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > > > Subject: Re: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just checked SMII Armies of the Imperium, Its not mentioned
> which orders
> > > > > they can be given - just the mechanics of actually
> teleporting (aim,
> > > > > scatter).
> > > > >
> > > > > Makes sense that they shouldn't be able to first fire though.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Paul "TuffSkull" T.
> > > > > http://epic40k.com - If its Epic, Its there! (Now an
> Official Warpgate
> > > > > Network site!)
> > > > > http://welcome.to/weird_world - Weird World Wargaming.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: <jyrki.saari_at_n...>
> > > > > To: <netepic_at_y...>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:30 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: ext nils.saugen_at_s... [mailto:nils.saugen_at_s...]
> > > > > > > Sent: 21. March 2002 15:12
> > > > > > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Guess? Questions.... ^^
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You should check the old GW rules! I think they enter on
> > > > > > > advance orders, but
> > > > > > > I'm not certain! However, I think it is stated clearly in
> the
> > > > > > > old GW rules.
> > > > > > > I could check that this afternoon if you don't have those
> > > > > > > anymore! Or you
> > > > > > > could have a look in the old Battles book (The big yellow
> > > > > > > one), in the chaos
> > > > > > > vs bloodangels game, they use Gray knights.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nils
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the battlereport you mentioned they charged into CC with
> Magnus the
> > > > Red
> > > > > so judging from that they are on charge orders. However, IIRC
> it's not
> > > > > specifically mentioned in the rules (surprise!).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jyrki Saari
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes
> time and time
> > > > > is money.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sun Mar 24 2002 - 13:26:52 UTC