Hi,
One could easily argue that the pop-up ability is a very
defensive strategy. At the same time, it is also a very offensive
strategy. It is hit and run, and only units on FF may fire on a unit which has executed a pop-up attack. I do agree with you though, the pop-up ability is very Eldar, and i'd hate to see it change.
Rune
> Fra: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/03/26 Tue AM 10:06:42 CET
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar Scorpion and Cobra Tanks
>
> Im afraid I dont agree. No other Superheavy has anything like shields, IMO neither should the Eldar SH. The Eldar amy is supposed to be a hard hitting and offencive army. By trading popups for holofields we take away some hittingpower and makes them more deffensive.
>
> I think this is the wrong way to go with the Eldar.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Zerloon <zerloon_at_...>
> > Dato: 2002/03/25 Mon AM 01:02:53 CET
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar Scorpion and Cobra Tanks
> >
> > At 21.08 23/03/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >That may be an interesting trade-off. I agree it is funny to imagine a
> > >huge super-heavy popping-up and perhaps a holofield would be better.
> >
> > I agree too.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 26 2002 - 09:32:06 UTC