Re: [NetEpic ML] More brainstorming

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:30:30 -0400

Hi!

I agree it is a lot simpler. Right now there are two rules, one for infantry and the other for vehicles. This idea is pretty good and saves a lot of blah, blah, rules explanation wise.

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lorenzo Canapicchi" <lorenzo.canapicchi_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] More brainstorming


>
>
> jyrki.saari_at_... wrote:
>
> > But IIRC this isn't much different from the current titan defence system rules.
> >
> > Personally, however, I like it. I don't mind Titans being next to impossible to kill by infanftry. Just picture trying to stop a walking fortress by a bundle of grenades or whatever the poor bloody footsloggers have.
>
> Yes, I was just suggesting something similar but more simple to manage.
>
> --
> Lorenzo Canapicchi
> TXT e-solutions S.p.A.
> Via Frigia 27, 20126 Milano Italy
> tel: 02.25771.460
> http://www.txt.it
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 27 2002 - 14:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:32 UTC