Hi!
Your idea is good too. The rule already exists for vehicles where they
may fire with their bolters in defense of charging infantry. Extending
this to titans does seem logical. To keep it simple why not give as many
bolters as CAF the titan has? Easier to keep track.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: dkaardal [mailto:dkaardal_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:30 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] More brainstorming
--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Actually your no more than 6 stands fit on titan legs and the
stomping
> are the only rules needed. The more I think about them the more I
like
> it. Simple and effective.
>
> Peter
I'd still rather just see bolters stuck on the titans. don't need any
new rules that way.
as for the 6 stands... I can live with that, I suppose.. .though
logically it doesnt make any sense.
"ok, sarge, you take those 30 men and attack it, then when you die
I'll take my 30 men and attack it. It'll never expect us to charge in
easily killable waves"
;)
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Mar 28 2001 - 16:39:55 UTC