Hi,
this is great news for me. It is hard to explain the supposed
meaning of a power to a player who assumes that when a thing
isnt stated as forbidden, it is legal. I sure can breathe
more easily now :)
Rune
>
> Fra: "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/04/07 Sun AM 03:15:34 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Question
>
> Hi!
>
> No, but I see the problem here. I would rule that the card affects any
> model or unit that is not a super-heavy/knight and of course
> titan/praetorians.
>
> I think this will be the overall blanket statement for most if not all
> chaos powers. Simply put, chaos powers are good, but should affect only
> regular units not special ones like titans and knights. Of course powers
> that are straight attacks (like firing a weapon) would work against
> anything.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rune Karlsen [mailto:rune.karlsen6_at_...]
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 8:30 PM
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Question
>
> Hi,
>
> Also, what you're saying is that you can use this power on a company
> card of Shadowswords, but not
> if you buy them separately as support cards? This just doesn't make
> sense. Also, all knights come as detachments.
> Should you be able to use it on them? I sure as hell won't field any
> knights against chaos if that is true, Trygve
> ALWAYS plays with these naughty children, and to devastating effect so
> far (well, for Slann/Necrons at least).
> The emperor should start using condoms, he's got waaay too many pesky
> brats running about, bothering honest
> toads with their psychic powers ;)
>
> Rune
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Ramos <mailto:primarch_at_...>
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 1:55 AM
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Question
>
> Hi!
>
> Ah! Chaos! I foresee some interesting revision questions when its their
> time!
>
> Anytime something says "unit" it means "detachment" not individual
> models, because when its individual models it usually states "model". So
> you can affect any one "detachment" not an individual model like a super
> heavy or titan.
>
> No doubt chaos wording will be a LOT of work.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rune Karlsen [mailto:rune.karlsen6_at_...]
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 7:34 PM
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Question
>
> Hi,
>
> got some questions :)
>
> regarding the Lure of Slaanesh (Emperor's Children reward). When it says
> any enemy unit, does that mean f.ex a titan, a detachment of knights or
> a command unit?
> When you take over a unit, can you use that unit right away, or do you
> have to wait until its
> your turn again? Can you move the emperor's children, and then use the
> card after you've finished
> moving? How high is such a power priced? The company card costs 500. If
> this card is able
> to take over, say a super heavy or higher, without a saving throw, is it
> fairly priced?
>
> Rune
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=214508.1858224.3361270.1501205/D=egroupweb/S=1705
> 059081:HM/A=949165/R=0/*http:/content.search.shopping.yahoo.com/search/t
> mpl?tmpl=psshowcase2001.html&query=tag:PSshowcase2001+%23cversion%3A%7Bi
> mage_PSshowcase2001+url_PSshowcase2001+desc_PSshowcase2001+title_PSshowc
> ase2001+morehtml_PSshowcase2001%7D&q=PSshowcase2001>
>
>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=214508.1858224.3361270.1501205/D=egrou
> pmail/S=1705059081:HM/A=949165/rand=268277769>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
>
>
[ Attachment content not displayed ]
Received on Sun Apr 07 2002 - 08:18:51 UTC