Hi!
I think open-sheaf barrages could be introduced as an advanced optional
rule, where artillery can decide to separate barrages at the expense of
barrage strength.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:46 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core Rules Part II
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext brandu [mailto:brandu_at_...]
> Sent: 22. April 2002 7:28
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core Rules Part II
>
>
> --- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >
>
> > --> Yes: ONLY ARTILLERY UNITS MAY (in fact, they MUST) COMBINE
> > BARRAGES. NON-ARTILLERY UNITS MAY NOT, AND CANNOT FIRE INDIRECT
> > BARRAGES, TOO. Simple and necessary, IMHO.
> >
> > ----> That's a good clarification since I cant think of any
> exception to
> > this generalization.
> >
>
> Basilisks?
>
>
Nope, Manticores. However, I don't see a problem in allowing artillery
fire separate barrages. That could represent harassing fire.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is money.
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 13:51:07 UTC