RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core Rules Part II

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:49:27 -0400

Hi!

Are light walkers and such really any different from cavalry, bikes and
infantry?

Leaving dreadnoughts and robots in their own pinning class and shifting
cavalry and bikes back with infantry should do the trick.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:42 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core Rules Part II

[snip]
> ----> That sounds interesting; I guess dreadnoughts are more like
> vehicles for pinning, but what about robots? I wonder for
> simplicity we
> should not just keep them in class 4. Also bikes and cavalry are the
> same and in number 4, unless you are arguing that they should be in
> their own category.
>
> Here's a thought:
>
> 1. Titans/Praetorians
> 2. Super Heavy Vehicles/Knights
> 3. All other vehicles
> 4. Dreadnoughts/robots/cavalry/bikes
> 5. Troop Stands
> 6. Skimmers
>
> What do people think about his?
>

I'de still leave cavalry and bikes in the same category as troop stands.
Oherwise OK; we've been discussing a long time about making dreads and
robots better and this would make them better.

However, this leaves one problem: sentinels and war walkers. Should we
classify them as light walkers or something?

[snap]
> Peter
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is money.


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 13:49:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:36 UTC