As long as buildings are obvious targets, you cannot hide the HQ in a cheesy fashion. Thats why I dont really see the need of changing the targetting rules we have now.
Eivind
>
> Fra: "Weasel Fierce" <septimus__at_...>
> Dato: 2002/04/26 Fri PM 02:46:29 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: HQ targeting Part IV
>
>
> >
> >And yes, I agree that a building should always be a valid target. Giving
> >the HQ immunity when in one, though - I'm afraid I'll have to disagree. I
> >think there should be the 1-in-6 change of being able to target the HQ
> >specificly.
>
> Part of the proposed rule was that HQ's within either 6 or 10 cm. of regular
> troops cannot be targeted, to avoid over much targeting towards HQ's and
> thus make IG armies etc mpossible to use
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 26 2002 - 13:00:10 UTC