[NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] New Imperial units

From: antichrist666it <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 09:56:27 -0000

--- In netepic_at_y..., "Millett, George" <George.Millett_at_b...> wrote:
> > Disagree with IG having them removed as per an earlier post I put
> on the
> > list SM chapters are all pretty much the same with very few
changes
> between
> > them whilst IG change radically across the galaxy to adapt to the
> changing
> > situations thrown up and the tendencies of the worlds that they
> were raised
> > from.
>
> Where you read it? In my mind IG it's the exact opposite...
>
>
> -------> The various Second Edition 40K codexes. The codex
Ultramarines had
> pretty much the entire marine chapter makeup and the background for
why in
> it and the IG codex details several different worlds that have
contributed
> regiments to the IG and each has its own special manner of fighting.
> Consider Attila and Mordia for one on Attila Every one learns to
ride a
> horse almost before they can walk so Attila is rightly famous for
its rough
> riders whilst on Mordia The Iron Guard are renowned for their
discipline and
> firing lines.
>
> Its that and a heavy dose of logic. The Imperium covers most of the
galaxy
> with a great variation in worlds both in a climate sense and in the
> technological base it is absolutely ridiculous to assume that what
works on
> 1 planet will work on another.

Got it. =)

The fact it's that I like the IG characterization given in the 3rd
edition W40k (just infantry and tanks). Btw... I'm against Imperial
Assault detachments as well...
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 09:56:27 UTC