RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Imperial revision: marines part I

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:20:40 -0400

Hi!

I second that these guys should be pretty tough. Veterans should be
better too.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Weasel Fierce [mailto:septimus__at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:50 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Imperial revision: marines part I


>Scouts
>Space Marine Scouts are the initiates that have yet to prove themselves
in
>battle. They may infiltrate after initial deployment up to their full
>charge move before the battle begins. Scouts do not wear tactical armor
and
>thus are less protected than other Space Marines.
>Models: Scout models on the GW Space Marine sprue, or IG Tactical
models on
>the GW Imperial Guard sprue.
>
> > IMO the wording on the infiltration sould be clearer. something
like:
>The scouts often infiltrate the battlefield and sneak near enemy
positions
>to lanch surprise attacks. To represent this the scouts get an extra
move.
>After initial deployment but before the battle begins the scouts may be

>moved up to their full charge move.
>
>In the old rules the scouts could not be moved closer than 5cm to any
enemy
>troops. Has this changed in some revision? I could see the
justification of
>letting the scouts be moved into CC with the infiltration eg. making a
>surprise assault.

The infiltration rule should be clarified and then moved to the core
rules.


> >Any need to change any stats?

I wold like to see assault marines with a +4. To put them more in line
with
other troops.

It seem ridiculous that the trained assualt troops of the marines are no

better than a goff ork. And that eldar apect warriors can walk over them



Weasel



_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 21:20:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:38 UTC