RE: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:13:27 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Weasel Fierce [mailto:septimus__at_hotmail.com]
> Sent: 08. May 2002 0:01
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
>
>
>
> >
> >The assault cannon ones are IMO included in the normal
> terminator stands,
> >hence the better to-hit roll and save modifier. As for do we
> need the
> >Cyclone launchers, that is for the listmembers to decide.
>
> i definately do not think so. Otherwise, we should make
> devastator marines
> with different heavy weapons too.
>

Why? The long-ranged heavy weapons the devastators have produce broadly similar effects wheras you really can't compare a Cyclone and an Assault cannon. It would give the terminators some support.

> Stick to the basics here
>

Insufficient data, please clarify; define "basics" ;)

>
> Weasel
>
>
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Wed May 08 2002 - 05:13:27 UTC