RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:18:34 -0400

Hi!

Yes, "special" units like this could be elite, that's okay since most of
them are optional anyway. But when you evaluate Core" units only, its
real difficult to find "worthy" elite units.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Millett, George [mailto:George.Millett_at_...]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:40 AM
To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls

Also some armies, by fluff would have little to no
elites, its not their nature. Look at orks and IG, outside VERY few
special units (even if then) could be categorised as elites.


As a way around this might it not be an idea to and some named
formations to
these armies along with some background as to why they deserve that
status
for example in the IG there is "Shaeffer's Last Chancers", the Catachan
Devils that really stand out from the rest of the IG and I am sure that
their are similarly renowned/ notorious units ork formations somewhere,
then
have a restriction of how many of these renowned formations you can
field in
an army as naturally they would be unique units.

G


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri May 10 2002 - 14:18:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:39 UTC