I definitely agree.
--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Note the formula is old, version 1.0 old. Also some units are
> underpriced because it is recognized that some armies
get "cheapies". I
> have wondered about this a lot. I wonder if it is time to eliminate
such
> cheapness from all armies and price according to a hard and fast
> formula.
>
> What do people think?
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_m...]
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 7:45 PM
> To: netepic_at_y...
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: Unit Point Costs
>
> >I think Birol's the only one to do it in that way and even that
case
> >does not cover all the existing abilities.
> >
> >Peter
>
> I've been putting some numbers together, and I've found that I
can't get
> Birol's formula, my numbers and the NetEpic unit stats to line up.
The
> units have changed, as have army cards and composition since he did
his
> work. I'm not going to attempt to update his work unless there is a
> significant demand for it, or I get really bored.
>
> Instead I submit my existing file, "Proposed Core Army Cards &
Costs",
> currently in the Files section. Please take a look at it and let me
know
> what you think.
> -Yar
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_e...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon May 13 2002 - 17:06:41 UTC