Hi!
Well, like I said, if you do I'll put it in.
As you have learned "broke" is relative......
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:19 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: 5.0 review
>Since no doubt Jar's reading all this, continue with your points
project
>and apply it to everything under the sun. I will make sure it gets a
>place under the title "alternate points cost". As with all alternate
>rules, some will use one and others another. I promise I won't send the
>net epic police to anyone's house <laugh>
>
>Peter
Yep - I've been reading all two-hundred-posts-in-a-day of it. *grin* I'm
still working on a cost analysis, comparing the result to both the
origional Space Marine and the NetEpic 4 costs. My initial reaction is
that
I won't be proposing very many changes at all - for two reasons. One,
the
points aren't all that different (all changes so far are 50 points or
less), and two, the feeling on the ML is "if it ain't broke..." *shrug*
*grin* It's getting me some experience with Excel, at least.
-Yar
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue May 14 2002 - 19:28:19 UTC