jyrki.saari_at_... wrote:
>>I don't agree here, a more sensible rule could be limiting
>>WRH in number or
>>increase the cost (adding points) for multiple choice of the
>>same card, but
>>once for all, stop moan about WRH, only a non expert Eldar
>>player can say
>>that WRH it's underpriced, believe me, you have to se all the
>>army as a
>>whole thing not just a bounce of single cards.
>>
> Shut up and do as I say, huh? I wouldn't exactly call Peter a "non-expert".
This is not what I said, and hope this list need different points of view
to grow, this is the purpose for the presence of so many members in the
list, different experiences, different tactics, different cultures and so on.
I think that when Peter asked me to join the list (years ago) he expected
that I was someone with a specific skill about Eldar and marine Armies and
not someone always willing to agree with him.
He is IMHO one of the most expert Epic player that I know, He played since
the beginning AT and so on, I think he's a great guy and an old friend, but
above of all he's a member of this list, period.
I give my contribution to this list based on my experience as an Eldar
general, I have no reason to defend a cheesiness of Eldar Army, is not
really funny for a veteran to play with an army that don't gives you the
opportunity to test your ability more and more every time you play, but I
think that if someone could be changed for an Epic Army race the better
judge is an expert player of that race, the one that after years (years) of
games knows at first sight what's wrong on his race and not someone that
look from outside.
I can only guess ideas about Tyrannids, Orks or Squats, I can give my
opinons but I don't risk any judgment for radical armies changes on other
races, and I leave this duty to more "expert" players than me, not expert
in general but expert 'couse they really knows their races as a second skin.
--
Lorenzo Canapicchi
TXT e-solutions S.p.A.
Via Frigia 27, 20126 Milano Italy
tel: 02.25771.460
http://www.txt.it
Received on Wed May 15 2002 - 09:38:24 UTC