RE: [NetEpic ML] Old Armies, New Divisions

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:31:51 -0400

Hi!

The editing aspect of this is still in the air, since we don't have an
official editor as of yet. Basically it comes down to this, whoever the
editor is, he pretty much gets the final say on "how it gets organized
since he'll be doing all the work. Suggestions will be submitted of
course (like a stat summary at the end of each book), but its each
editors particular vision that prevails in the end. For evidence of this
all you need is to look at all the previous versions and see the
differences.

The books are damn big and some consideration on saving people printing
materials should be given. So it should be two books at least and I
would not mind it being and individual book to make them smaller.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:28 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Old Armies, New Divisions

>Armies of the Imperium- Jyrki, Weasel, Josh
>Defenders of the Imperium- Jyrki, Weasel, Josh

Question: Why do we have two Imperial books? I've looked at the Imperial
forces and there're basicly four armies:

Planetary Defense Force

Imperial Guard - Sisters of Battle are equivalent but with fancy names
and
better special units

Space Marines

Titan Legions - I prefer the origional name to the, IMHO, wimpy and
non-descriptive "Tech-Guard"


Proposal #1: Have two Imperial army books. One covering the PDF and
Imperial Guard, the other with Space Marines and Titan Legions. That
divides the Imperial forces into those that generally stay on a planet,
and
those that travel all over the place. Special branches would be included
in
the appropriate book (SoB in the first, unique Chapters in the second).


Proposal #2: Have four Imperial army books. I propose this on the basis
that the current "Armies of the Imperium" is already too big to staple.
*grin*


I can accept a "I like it the way it is" arguement, but please don't
give
me any "that's the way GW does it" stuff. They're GW and we're NetEpic -
I'd like to think that *we* make some sense.
-Yar





To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu May 16 2002 - 12:31:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:40 UTC