RE: RE: Sv: [NetEpic ML] Additional suggestion for LR Crusader

From: Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 23:42:13 +0200

So same normal base move. :-)

Unless you want to strip the weight down by removing some armour...

Sam

-------> That is what I have done in my original suggestion that has been an
optional unit so far. That way it can fulfill its role more completely.

Eivind

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Dale [mailto:epic_at_...]
Sent: 22. mai 2002 21:33
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: Sv: [NetEpic ML] Additional suggestion for LR Crusader


> > If that is not an assault transport, then what is? Siege tank is a
different thing altogether, designed to destroy enemy fortifications.
Vindicator is a siege tank, as is Bombard. Crusader carries no bunker
busting weaponry. It is intended to transport infantry into the midst of the
enemy, eg. it is an assault transport.

> -----------> And therefore it should have greater move than a normal LR
:-)

It will do cos it'll get put on Charge orders more of the time cos it
doesn't have to worry about firing lascannons at anything. Same chassis,
same engine, different guns, different role.

So same normal base move. :-)

Unless you want to strip the weight down by removing some armour...

Sam



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu May 23 2002 - 21:42:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:41 UTC