I disagree with your decision for the first poll to
change the terminators. 2/3 is the cut-off and this
was not met. People want to change their saves but
there is no 2/3 consensus on any of the choices and
there is a big difference between a 4+ and 5+ save
whether it is modified or not. Terminators usually die
from bolter fire and not lascannon fire.
Why don't you have a poll to see which upgrade is
preferred but this would also end up in a 50/50 draw
making the upgrade point meaningless. 2/3 is 2/3. I
wanted he Space Marine bike company too but hey we
couldn't get the 2/3 majority and this was much closer
than the terminator poll. Just my thoughts.
Darius
--- jyrki.saari_at_... wrote:
> POLL QUESTION: Which saving throw for terminator
> marines do you prefer.
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - 4+ save modifiable to 6+ but no further., 17
> votes, 50.00%
> - 5+ unmodifiable save., 8 votes, 23.53%
> - Current one (5+ modifiable to 6+)., 9 votes,
> 26.47%
>
> This was two-in-one. First part is whether people
> want to change the Terminators' save or not. Since
> about 74% of those who voted prefer an upgrade, the
> save will be changed.
>
> POLL QUESTION: Should infiltrating units be allowed
> to
> enter close combat with their
> infiltration move?
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, 13 votes, 40.62%
> - No, 19 votes, 59.38%
>
> This is a clear one. A clarification should be added
> to the "Infiltration" special ability in the core
> rules.
>
> POLL QUESTION: Members will decide whether Cyclone
> terminators will be added to the
> armylist.
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, 20 votes, 60.61%
> - No, 13 votes, 39.39%
>
> Since less than 2/3 favors this one, it will not be
> a core unit. However, it has large enough support to
> warrant an optional unit. The next question will be
> about how to implement the Cyclones. Stay tuned!
>
> POLL QUESTION: Land Raider Crusader availablity to
> chapters other than Black Templars.
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - One detachment only to replace the transports of
> one terminator detachment., 7 votes, 22.58%
> - One separate detachment., 15 votes, 48.39%
> - The current one (a special card to replace the
> transports of entire terminator company., 7 votes,
> 22.58%
> - Other (please send suggestion to the list)., 2
> votes, 6.45%
>
> Again, a clear one. From now on LRC will be
> available as one detachment per chapter other than
> the Black Templars (and possibly White Scars
> depending on the outcome of the speed poll; see the
> latest incoming).
>
> POLL QUESTION: Should assault marine CAF be raised
> to
> +4?
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, 11 votes, 34.38%
> - No, 21 votes, 65.62%
>
> Assault marine CAF will not be raised.
>
> POLL QUESTION: Do the veteran marines need a stat
> change?
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, raise the to-hit number to 4+., 13 votes,
> 41.94%
> - Yes, give them 2 attack dice., 6 votes, 19.35%
> - No, they are good enough as they are., 12 votes,
> 38.71%
>
> This is a close one, but again slightly less than
> 2/3 favors a change. This means the veterans will
> stay as they are.
>
> POLL QUESTION: Members will decide whether a marine
> bike company (see part I summary) will
> be added to the marine armylist.
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, 20 votes, 62.50%
> - No, 12 votes, 37.50%
>
> Since less than 2/3 wants to include this it will
> not be a core unit (&#XX$!). However, the support is
> again strong enough to warrant an optional unit.
>
> The Part I is thus concluded. Part II polls will be
> concluded 6.6.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating
> takes time and time is money.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
Received on Thu May 23 2002 - 22:32:00 UTC