RE: [NetEpic ML] Epic Armageddon PDF file up

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 17:23:13 -0400

Hi!

Of all those rules only zones of control I think can be of real benefit
since it solves the old problem of players wanting to race past some
units to engage others. This rule makes that easier to understand and
execute.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 4:17 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic Armageddon PDF file up

>okay..Just to throw this in....whats the big point about blast markers
?
>
>I mean..suppression is a fact of combat.
>
>Weasel

It sure is. That's one of the good ideas I've noticed. An initiative
roll
to activate more than one detachment is another, as is the Zone of
Control
concept and AP/AT weapons. I'm going to be looking at the rules in
greater
detail in a few days, trying to figure out how to integrate them into
Net
Epic. I should have a few proposals later next week.
-Yar



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sat May 25 2002 - 21:23:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:42 UTC