The "outsiders" view on this one:
Such walkers should only be able to travel in units with a transport
capacity of 3 or more, and then take up 2 transport spaces each. This
prevents things such as Rhinos carrying large walkers which simply would not
fit in, but also allows for a simple ruling rather than having a heap of
individual cases having to be defined (Dreds in Thunderhawks.... Wraithguard
in Vampires etc..)
Cheers,
Paul "TuffSkull" T.
http://epic40k.com - If its Epic, Its there! (Now an Official Warpgate
Network site!)
http://welcome.to/weird_world - Weird World Wargaming.
----- Original Message -----
From: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] New poll for netepic
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> netepic group:
>
> Should the ability to transport
> infantry include the ability to carry
> Walker-class units (Dreadnaughts,
> Sentinels, Tinbotz, etc.)?
>
> o Yes - they count as one infantry stand.
> o Yes - they count as two infantry stands.
> o No.
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/netepic/surveys?id=921879
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Mon May 27 2002 - 12:20:13 UTC