Weasel Fierce wrote:
>>Completely agree with you,I really don't need all the changes we are making
>>to NetEpic Today, I supposed to make minor changes to optimize and Tune Up
>>netEpic, not this drastic revision, and this was also the original idea for
>>the NetEpic Project.
>>
>
> NetEpic was originally about keeping 2nd edition alive, but also about
> changing and improving it.
Thanks, but I think I don't need to know wich was the MetEpic purpose...
all these years we have improved the game but now too many changes , in few
time are made, and too fast.
In the beginning we always believed that playtesting was one of the most
needed thing in Epic, something that GW never did, NetEpic was at first one
of the answer; "Game rules from gamers" and not from a bulky, greedy, bimbo
sized game company too busy doing cash to test games (someone still
remember our offer to GW for playtesting the e40k beta version?).
This is the NetEpic Project I know.
> NetEpic have a lot of faulty and / or broken / ineffective stuff.
>
> I dont see a reason to not change something if its not working.
I've never said this, just that maybe we go too fast with too work in progress.
> I mean..even GW sometimes learn and improve their mistakes.
I'm not surprised...
> Why shouldnt we ?
Yes why not, but don't forget an important task that is playtesting.
--
Lorenzo Canapicchi
TXT e-solutions S.p.A.
Via Frigia 27, 20126 Milano Italy
tel: 02.25771.460
http://www.txt.it
Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 13:17:51 UTC