RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Blood Angels proposal; forgot something

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:27:34 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext [mailto:jyrki.saari_at_...]
> Sent: 14. June 2002 13:25
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Blood Angels proposal; forgot
> something
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Millett, George [mailto:George.Millett_at_...]
> > Sent: 14. June 2002 13:31
> > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Blood Angels proposal; forgot
> > something
> >
> >
> > What would happen to the detachment then as they would have
> > to stick within
> > 6cm of the now untransported infantry , assuming they survive the
> > immobilisation/crash?
> >
>
> That's the risk of using overcharged engines. A bit like
> unopened drop pods. Stay alert, use only when the risk is
> worth it, keep your techmarine handy! ;)
>

BTW, the passengers would automatically survive. The engines don't explode; they just seize up or shake themselves apart or something.

> > G
>
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Fri Jun 14 2002 - 10:27:34 UTC