Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] White Scars proposal summary

From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:58:53 +0200

I cant really see that this weapon is any more powerfull than other rhino-based weapons, such as the predator, the immolator, or the roth-of-nurgle-rhinos wich I dont remember the name of.

Im just uncertain wether it should transport termies...

Eivind
>
> Fra: Albert Farr� Benet <cibernyam_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/06/14 Fri PM 12:48:39 CEST
> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] White Scars proposal summary
>
> The weapon is too powerful. This way a single storm Bolter fired by the gunner of a Storm Rhino (which might not be a marine) has the same power as four storm bolters and an assault cannon fired by a terminator stand.
>
> I propose doubling the firepower of a Rhino (in the end a Storm Bolter is just two linked bolters).
>
> So: 15 cm 2 dice 6+ 0
>
> Albert
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:16 AM
> Subject: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] White Scars proposal summary
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I would say that the Crusader with 25 cm move would be the ideal vehicle, but it seems that people wont listen to reason... :-)
>
> An other option could be to mount them in razorbacks.
>
> Stats for the Storm Rihno are in the files section on the netepic group site, but for your convenience, here they are:
>
> Storm Rhino
> The Storm Rhino is quite simply an ordinary Rhino with the usual bolter replaced by a storm bolter to provide better close support for the troops.
>
> Miniature: Use the GW Rhino painted to emphasize the bolters or the GHQ M-16
>
> Unit Name Storm Rhino
> Move 25 cm
> Save 4+
> CAF 0
> Weapon Storm Bolter
> Range 35 cm
> Attack Dice 2
> To hit roll 4+
> Target's save modifier -1
> Notes Carries 2 infantry stands
>
> Support Card
> Name Storm Rhino Transport Det
> Contents 3 Storm Rhinos
> BreakPoint 2
> Morale 2
> VictoryPoints 1
> Cost 100
>
>
> Eivind
>
>
>


[ Attachment content not displayed ] Received on Fri Jun 14 2002 - 11:58:53 UTC