Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic A: should we say someting?

From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 7:25:02 +0200

Hi!

I agree with Darius! (Could not have said it better myself!)

Eivind
>
> Fra: darius spano <dmanspano_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/07/16 Tue AM 02:19:22 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic A: should we say someting?
>
> Hi,
> Personally, I thought the rules were changing for the
> better. E40K is all about firepower and suppressing
> units. I thought Epic A took some of that away and
> made it more realistic because close combat was more
> deadly and it encouraged more CC and validated troop
> stereo-types. I prefer Net Epic to E40k but I thought
> Epic A was improving some of E40K. I haven't seen
> vehicle rules.
> Let Jervis be. He will realize if its a dog or not and
> start from scratch or a different angle. The E40K
> group should be sending the messege to him not us. We
> play our own version of Space Marine and the two games
> are very different. How many of us have played E40K?
> If so, how many times? I have played it about 4-5
> times. The E40K group have played it hundreds of
> times. They are better at giving an opinion in that
> regard. We can offer ours as well but the strength
> behind it is not there. If anything let it play out.
> It may surprise us.
> On second thought, why not send him an encouraging
> email because we do take a lot of ideas for building
> armies and troop types from the Fanatic mag. He is
> also willing to support an epic scale while most games
> released these days are 28mm.
> Rambling & Rambling & More Rambling
> Darius the "undecided"/the "uncommitted"
>
> --- Kelvin Henderson <kx.henderson_at_...> wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I say that we should send in some sort of response
> > from the group. I
> > haven't been following Epic:A's development too
> > closely, I'll admit, but
> > some of what I have heard I like while other things
> > seem absurd. The best
> > way to get Fanatic's (and hence, Jervis') attention
> > is to draft a letter
> > from the whole group, noting our membership numbers
> > in particular, and send
> > it off.
> >
> > If we really want to have a say in the future of the
> > "official" Epic, then
> > we do need to say SOMETHING.
> >
> > -Kelvin....
> >
> > IMPORTANT. Antidisclaimer. This email is not and
> > cannot, by its nature, be
> > confidential. En route from me to you, it will pass
> > across the public
> > Internet, easily readable by any number of system
> > administrators along the
> > way. If you have received this message by mistake,
> > it would be ridiculous
> > for me to tell you not to read it or copy it to
> > anyone else, because, let's
> > face it, if it's a message revealing confidential
> > information or that could
> > embarrass me intensely, that's precisely what you'll
> > do. Who wouldn't?
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> http://autos.yahoo.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 16 2002 - 05:25:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:46 UTC