hehe...
OK by me, but then a cost increas would be in order. How much?
I would also consider this a "full" commander with all the usual benefits. I would also there make a limitation and only allow it to be attached to one tank-detachment just as the bike and horses.
Eivind
>
> Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> Dato: 2002/09/12 Thu PM 01:57:42 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
>
> I don't like that Idea! He should get his own (black) vehicle!!!! Besides,
> that would make a difference as for Bikes, Roughriders (and sentinels???) He
> would have his own vehicle/animal.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> Sent: 12. september 2002 13:54
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
>
>
> In the case of tanks, I was thinking that he climbed onboard one of the
> existing vehicles, not bringing along his own.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > Dato: 2002/09/12 Thu PM 01:43:41 CEST
> > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > They can already mount on horses, or bikes or in their rhinons. I see no
> > problems by mounting them in sentinels also for the same prise. There is a
> > catch tough. To be mounted on a horse the commisar must be attached to a
> > rough rider detachment and he may not command other detachments! If we
> where
> > to allow him to change his rhino in for a Leman Russ or something similar,
> I
> > think there should be some additional cost.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> > Sent: 12. september 2002 13:36
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] IG-Commisars
> >
> >
> > We have a mighty tank-battle comming up (maybe semi-mighty, just 4000
> > points) and it got me thinking. How about commissars attached to tank
> > companies, bike companies, rough riders and so on. Wouldnt it be natural
> > that theese units got the option of riding bikes/horses or catching a ride
> > with one of the tanks?
> >
> > I picture the tank being a kind of semi-commander, where it didnt have to
> be
> > given orders, but must follow all normal rules regarding movement and
> > firing. The commisar would be limited to only give orders to the
> detachment
> > he is catchin a ride. The rules regarding targetting commanders would
> still
> > apply and when the tank got shot, the VP for the commissar would be
> awarded
> > to the opposing player.
> >
> > In the case of bikes and horses, the commisar would just ride a bike/horse
> > in stead of a rhino. All normal commissar-rules would apply. Maybe the
> > commisar even could ride a sentinel??
> >
> > What are your thoughts on this?
> >
> > By the way, does anyone know of some decent proxies for rough riders?
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 12 2002 - 12:18:23 UTC