RE: [NetEpic ML] [OT] Epic:A

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:28:30 -0400

Hi!

Hmm.....interesting......perhaps we should voice our opinions after
all.....most interesting indeed!

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul T. [mailto:paul_j_t_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:12 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] [OT] Epic:A

Hi guys,

I don't know what Netepic's current position is with epic:A, but you
guys
are mentioned in the new Epic Newsletter, and Jervis has mentioned you
on a
couple of occasions to me me personally. My appologies if this is out of
place entirely.

To quote (Copy & Paste)the news letter:
"Although I've heard a little bit about negative feedback from some
players
of previous editions of Epic, when I received the email above no-one
(and I
mean no-one) had got in touch with me about it, while I've had literally
hundreds of emails from players that like the look of the new rules.
Then,
as luck would have it the very next day I received a long email that was
quite hostile about Epic Armageddon. I was extremely pleased to receive
the
email as I'd just about despaired of being sent any negative comments
about
EpicA all, and was considering writing directly to the NetEpic guys
asking
them to get in touch with me about what they think is wrong with the
Epic
Armageddon project. I still feel like I could do with more 'negative'
feedback, so if anybody reading this newsletter feels that the EpicA
project
is flawed or misguided, I would ask them to PLEASE get in touch. The
bottom
line is that constructive criticism is always welcome."

Similar sentiments have been echoed in private emails. If any of you do
have
things to say, he really does want to hear them, and if you don't why
not?
Is Epic:A shaping up to be that far from what you want that you're
ignoring
the game altogether or is it just that you don't think you'll really be
listned to?

If you haven't looked at it since its initial appearance, it has changed
quite a lot, and generally more towards the SM/TL/NE style of game.
We've
even persuaded them to change the flyer rules from the E40K system to
something new - though I reserve judgement of new testing before I say
that
its good - it just has to be better than the E40K version!

Anyway, I was simply asked to PLEAD for input as heknows you're one
group
that will have some negative stuff to say which he wants to hear.

Cheers,
Paul "TuffSkull" T.
http://epic40k.com - if its epic, Its there.....



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sat Oct 19 2002 - 00:28:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:48 UTC