RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Thoughts on Chaos

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:00:27 -0400

Hi!

You have been busy, eh? I would suggest, if Jar agrees, that you send
those files to him so it may facilitate his work. That way he can easily
make any changes the revision requires.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:58 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Thoughts on Chaos

--- In netepic_at_y..., "george_millett_uk" <Dead_Jester13_at_h...> wrote:
> 4. Let's get all the original traitor legions into the book. Last
> > go
> > > around hand some great ideas for legions such as the Iron Hands
> and
> > > Nighthunters. Most of them are associated with a single power,
> so
> > they
> > > can be inserted there, in the appropriate section.
> >
> > The Traitor Legions are nine, the book will be IMHO too huge...
> >
>
>
> Not necessarily as we don't really need that much per legion. Say a
> paragraph or two of background per legion, any special restrictions
> or new costs on existing army cards then any new army cards / rules
> for that legion. It would be a page at the most per legion so 9
extra
> pages. Anything more needed could be done in a "campaign pack"
> detailing the new units, battles of the campaign etc
>
> G

*cough cough* ehm... I've done additional units and rules for all
nine legions, including Primarchs... :P



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Nov 19 2002 - 23:00:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:49 UTC