[NetEpic ML] Re: Thoughts on Chaos

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:09:27 -0000

Yes, but if we mantain the same structure, we can field:
1 Greater D�mon
5 Support cards (including the company)
1 Special card

...end of the Traitor Legion army list. Anyone for a 1000pts battle?

--- In netepic_at_y..., deaconblue3_at_j... wrote:
> Jyrki writes:
> But is the primarch present in _every_ single battle fought by
forces of
> a legion? Especially since there are countless splinter legions
which
> have broken off from the parent legion. Besides, not all primarchs
are
> around any more. Horus and Night Haunter at least have bit the
bullet.
>
>
> -->I'll handle this in two parts. First, the "over use" of the
> Primarchs. IMO, this only matters if you're playing a campaign,
with
> simultaneous battles happening, though played out over different
days.
> In this case, the Primarch would only be present at 1 battle, while
his
> troops could be involved in several. Otherwise, it's not that much
of an
> issue fluff or rules wise, just a matter of taste. Second, taking
on the
> issue of those traitors who have met final retribution. A Chaos
warlord,
> leading acrusade IMO can act in the same manor as a Greater Demon.
While
> not having any nifty Chaos powers, or serious stats, they are on
the cusp
> of being such, and need to have a successful crusade to advance in
the
> Chaos Corporate structure. In this case, the war lord would either
> gather the various units by strength of will, or would have had them
> bequeathed to him/her/it by the various powers. Not a big chnage
or rule
> bender, just the addition of one paragraph and a stat line.
>
> Josh R
> "No matter where you go, there you are." B.Bonzai
Received on Wed Nov 20 2002 - 08:09:27 UTC