[NetEpic ML] Re: Let the Revision begin!!

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 12:04:33 +0200

[snip]
> Tanks and infantry should NOT share the same size class for
> pinning, in
> my humble opinion. I think it should look like this:
>
> 1. Titans/Praetorians
> 2. Super Heavy Vehiches/Knights
> 3. All other vehicles
> 4. Troop Stands
> 5. Skimmers
>

My point exacly!

>
> Tanks should rightly fear the infantry ambush. But the
> phased movement
> and pinning rules should not combine for the automatic ambush of
> vehicles.
>

Right, an ambushed tank is VERY likely dead meat.

>
> Tanks should be attacked in Close Combat, by infantry, because:
>
> A) The tank did not chose to move. (By choice or First Fire orders.)
> B) The tank initiated Close Combat with the infantry,
> (pinning the infantry).
> C) The infantry moved last, and ambushed the tank.
>
> Hey, that's my $.02!
>

Mine too. This is what I have been trying to say all the time.

> Warprat ;)
>

Jyrki Saari

[snip]
Received on Mon Jan 03 2000 - 10:04:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:50 UTC