RE: [NetEpic ML] Some Comments about Chaos 5.0

From: michael presnal <lordthor2001_at_...>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:13:58 -0500

there is no limit to the demise of chaos that they are inacting. don't question them for there more vile ways than this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lord Thor Champion of Chaos _at_#$%%%#*

>From: "Peter Ramos"
>Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Some Comments about Chaos 5.0
>Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:58:16 -0400
>
>Hi!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: talos402000
>[mailto:tamah0me_at_...]
>Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:53 PM
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] Some Comments about Chaos 5.0
>
>Hello, my name is Justin Phillips from Hollywood Florida and I had
>some comments and questions about Chaos 5.0.
>
>Stats
>
> What are the stats for Daemon Princes, Sorcerer of Chaos
>Undivided, and the mark of Chaos Undivided?
>
> >>I'm not sure we have stats for demon princes, although I think they
>have been put forth. If any one has an idea now is the time.
>
> >>The same applies to sorcerers "undivided", any suggestions are
>welcome.
>
>Rules
>
> I really like the new 5.0 army list but I didn't like the
>animosity rules or the limiting of chaos rewards for having
>different powers in the same army. If that's what everybody wants
>fine, but one penalty rule should be enough. Not two.
>
> >>I remember animosity, but not the other rule, which if included should
>be optional, they only voted rule for "core" inclusion is animosity and
>dividing CSM from the rest of chaos alone.
>
> Why do Tzeentch daemon engines get chaos rewards and no others do?
>
> >>>The fluff states tzeentch is a master magician so he has more "magic"
>access. That's okay, but I like to know if people think it is balanced
>with for example what Khorne gets.
>
> Does the astral hound count as a minor daemon?
>
> >>>Flesh hounds? I'm not familiar with that one.
>
> Does the phantom engine count as a daemon engine (if not, it
>shoould)?
>
> >>>Lost me on this one too.
>
> Why can't the Word Bearers not get Cultists? I would think that
>that would be right up their alley.
>
> >>I confess myself ignorant of that fluff, I'll let others respond.
>
>Units
>
> No Leman Russ. This takes away from the flavor of the Chaos army
>list (and they've never got it anywhere in any set of rules I've
>ever seen).
>
> >>Hmmm...I think this should be correct, cultists as PDF, have access to
>the leman russ.
>
> Get rid of the Thunderhawk and replace it with the Dreadclaw
>assult boat (thats more in line with the fluff). Not as fast or as
>heavily armed, but better armored and able to carry the same amount
>of troops.
>
> >>>That is certainly one option, better a unique unit that an imperial
>re-run.
>
> The basilisk should be limited to the Iron Warriors (1 support
>detachment, 1 per company but not a special card).
>
> One support detachment per company of the Iron Warriors should be
>able to take the mark of Khorne.
>
> >>I'll elt people who are into these specialty chapters tackle these.
>
>
>Well thats my two cents. I hope you found these comments useful.
>
> >>Indeed so, thank you for sharing!
>
>Peter
>
>
>

Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Received on Sat Mar 01 2003 - 05:13:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:52 UTC