Hi!
Well it seems Darius's idea for this rules has won critical acclaim!!
I must say, after much, thought, I cannot think of any downside to it
and it nicely eliminates most of the complaints people had with this
weapon. The all or nothing aspect of it has been successfully
neutralized with this rule.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelvin Henderson [mailto:kx.henderson_at_...]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:11 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Gutbuster Weapons: Q's
> > That's a very interesting and clever rule. I like it a lot.
> >
> > What do other people think?
>
>I like it! But since I am the honored Grand Master of the Fireswords
titan
>legion I may be just a little bit biased...
>
>Jyrki Saari
Well, as a big Orky player I was the first person to like the normal
rules
for the Gutbuster Ball. But after using it twice, I decided that it was
silly and too powerful. So I suggested that we play it using the "loses
1
cm of its roll distance for every shield knocked down" rule. Everyone
liked it. It just feels right to me. Sure, as the Ork player I'd
prefer
it to roll further and kill more stuff, but it just feels better to me
that
the shields slow the ball down as it crashes through them. I've had
times
where the Ball has crashed through all the shields on the Warlord,
smashed
its legs out and then gone on to splatter the ShadowSword Command tank
behind it. But I've also has days where the ball hit two shields, went
"Klunk" and then had to spend the rest of my gunfire taking out the rest
of
the shields. I've even had a pansy Space Elf Phantom play David Beckham
with the ball round off both its feet! (It later got painted in Arsenal
colours!)
-Kelvin....
_____________________________________________________
"Zathras is used to being beast-of-burden. Very sad life.
Probably have very sad death. But at least there is symmetry."
_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Mar 05 2003 - 23:38:44 UTC