RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] IG

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:01:36 -0400

Hi!

<grin> hehe, my poor senile brain seems to have remembered this argument
before. I personally prefer them to stay support, I agree they aren't as
powerful as some claim, but that's a preference issue.

As many of the solutions, perhaps an optional rules serves best.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 6:01 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] IG

Hi,

This has been discussed many times before! The deatstrikes aren't all
that
good! Making them special cards would just be the same as removing them
form
the game!

NIls

-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: 7. mars 2003 10:59
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] IG


Battalion command costs as much as regimental command even though the
former
has lower morale. Shouldn't there be at least a small (25pts)
difference?

A suggestion I made a while go to which there was no reply:
The Deathstrikes should be made a special card. After all, I can't see
_every_ company having the possibility of having 5(!) batteries of
cruise
missiles as support!!!

Jyrki Saari

To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Mar 07 2003 - 23:01:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:52 UTC