RE: [NetEpic ML] Just some thoughts

From: Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 00:44:51 +0100

Have not given it much thought but you might be right. There should be some
terrain-penalties to CAF. For example, in every other strategygame i know,
cavalry gets panalties if fighting infantry CC in woods. There are no such
thing in netepic, but it should be, at least some optional rules.

Eivind

-----Original Message-----
From: darius spano [mailto:dmanspano_at_...]
Sent: 15. mars 2003 00:12
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Just some thoughts



Hi,
I was just thinking about scenarios and the lack of
them. Yes there is dawn assault, siege, defend, but is
their a compilation of any of these on the Epicenter
website? Most games its 4000 pts vs. 4000 pts and its
over in 2-3 turns and capture all the objectives. I am
just ondering if anyone is playing scenario driven
games opposed to the old standard of objective pummel
your opponent.
My other thought is that hills aren't taken into
account for CC bonuses. They can restrict your
movement but not your ability to fight CC. Let's say a
squad of space marines charge up 15cm to meet their
enemy aren't they going to be tired? Shouldn't their
CAF be reduced or the hill defenders get a bonus or a
reroll of their lowest CC dice. What's the sense of
having high ground. I think should affect all ground
based units except skimmers/floaters.
Would like to hear what you think.
Darius

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:44:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:52 UTC