Well, my POV is that bad enemies make good friends, so a Squat-Eldar
alliance against Chaos or Tyranids is not out of order. In any case, this
may be adjusted as fit. That's why I included the comercial Squat codex
army list, thus if you want to play open minded Squat society, you can do it
without remorse. Maybe we should limit the possibility to ally with Eldar
only when facing Chaos, Tyranids or Orks. Or just add that -1 initiative
penalty. Or both.
Albert Farr� Benet
----- Original Message -----
From: "AntiChrist" <seimejote_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Squats part 1 general
...I would never see one! Squat shouldn't ally with Eldar, IMO (the
obvious elf-dwarf hate).
--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Albert Farr� Benet <cibernyam_at_h...>
wrote:
> It's fine with me. BTW I've never seen any game with Squat and
Eldar playing
> allies.
>
> Albert
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jyrki.saari_at_n...>
> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:11 AM
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Squats part 1 general
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Albert Farr� Benet [mailto:cibernyam_at_h...]
> Sent: 16 June, 2003 20:56
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Squats part 1 general
>
>
> General
>
> Unless exceptionally noted, Squats can ally with Imperial, Eldar,
[snip]
>
> Since Squats feel deep animosity (if not exactly hatred) towards
Eldar I
> suggest a
> -1 penalty to initiative for combined Squat/Eldar forces (due to
command
> friction and mutual mistrust) should be considered.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Jun 17 2003 - 10:52:29 UTC